KLAR's contribution-margin work is the reference in the DACH market, and its reporting depth is real. nod. matches the measurement approach - own pixel, honest CM, EU hosting - and adds the half KLAR deliberately leaves out: acting.
Measuring is your whole problem, you want maximum reporting depth for it, and a revenue-tiered price is fine because analytics is the only thing you are buying.
You want the same GDPR-native, contribution-margin-first measurement, and then you want to do something with it: build and launch Meta and Google campaigns, approve the creatives, all in one product.
History backfills from your platforms, the pixel goes live in minutes, and contracts are monthly. Most teams run nod. next to their old tool for a few weeks and compare numbers before cancelling anything.